Thursday, January 29, 2015

On (Cock) Size and Other Stuff

Faithful Reader Grandma Jean sent a wonderful article from the New York Times. I love it when folks contribute to the conversations here! The piece was filled with some very interesting observations the journalist culled from his research on sex.
Apparently, men are still obsessed with the size of their cocks. Well, of course we are. Though we seem to be much more concerned about length...
Along the top: Wrong way to measure

Along the underside: Wrong

Along the side: Correct
than we are about girth
Correct

Yep
It goes waaaaay back in time. It is the instinctual need to know we will be able to plant our seed deeper than a competitor.
gay readers - I'm sure you can handle the occasional pussy pic
Scientists have also come to believe the shape of the cockhead is to enable ours to backscoop another man's semen from the vaginal canal.
Coronal Ridge for scooping
The other interesting thing he suggests puts the gay population over 10% - it's just that so many men are still loathe to admit they're gay. Well, now...as I believe, and have said here before, just because a guy enjoys stroking cock with his buddies, grabbing a handful of a man's package, or even playing cock-to-cock - does not mean he's gay.
Buddies bonding time




It means he enjoys the bonding comraderie over a common activity. Could you classify them as Bisexual? I'd accept that more readily than tossing them into the gay column.

There's much more in the article to cover later.

9 comments:

Unknown said...

Interesting info! Great images as always! Thanks for your visits and comments, Patrick

Your French Patrick said...

I think that you are right about Stan. He is another Stan or it is schedulded posts. If not, how would you have been able to know why he died.

I have re-installed my blog and all it’s customizations, all that to be not deprived of your comments that I love to the moon and back, as you know.
More than two hours lost, it was not the problem.
Nevertheless I found what I had to do and now it works well.
Click on “Or pick a name”, enter a name and a mail address, and it’s OK.

You are right, we are much more concerned about length, and it's 100% stupid, the girth is a lot much more important to give pleasure.

Wishing you a wondrous day, my dear friend, with a lot of bisous.

Anonymous said...

Problem is you can't do much about either, but especially girth.
Can you give us the link to the article, even if after you finish all your posts based on it?

Xersex said...

size does matter!!!!

enjoy my last post:

http://menforxersex.blogspot.it/2015/01/happy-birthday-bernardo-velasco.html

and happy frigay!!!

Anonymous said...

Very interesting article. Things to think about. Thanks for all the delicious pix to wet my appetite and inspire my stroke. Wishing you a Super weekend, brother. Hugs and Strokes, AOM

SickoRicko said...

I can see that measuring length on the underside is inaccurate, but what difference whether the side or the top?

whkattk said...

@ Rick - Top will give a false length - as in shorter; under reports longer. Side reports the middle ground - basically the point where the cock will penetrate no further.

whkattk said...

@ Anon - absolutely!

SickoRicko said...

Ahh, I understand now!